invalid contract造句
例句與造句
- On the invalid contract system in the new contract law
試論新合同法中的無(wú)效合同制度 - Thoughts on the limits of invalid contract stipulated in our contract law
對(duì)我國(guó)合同法中無(wú)效合同范圍的思考 - An analysis of the legislation and judicial trials concerning invalid contracts
無(wú)效合同制度的立法與司法審判探析 - Accept the labor contract that fraudulent action signs , it is invalid contract
采取欺詐行為簽訂的勞動(dòng)合同，是無(wú)效合同。 - The body consists of the following three parts : the first part is about the understanding of the invalid contract
適用訴訟時(shí)效的起算點(diǎn)統(tǒng)一以合同確認(rèn)無(wú)效之次日為準(zhǔn)。 - It's difficult to find invalid contract in a sentence. 用invalid contract造句挺難的
- Article 97 the employing unit shall bear the responsibility for compensation if the conclusion of any invalid contracts is attributed to the unit and have caused damages to labourers
第九十七條由于用人單位的原因訂立的無(wú)效合同，對(duì)勞動(dòng)者造成損害的，應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任。 - Section 97 . the employing unit shall bear the responsibility for compensation if the conclusion of any invalid contracts is attributed to the unit and have caused damages to labourers
第九十七條由于用人單位的原因訂立的無(wú)效合同，對(duì)勞動(dòng)者造成損害的，應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任。 - Further more , it stressed that the invalid contract should be strictly limited within the provisions of article 52 in the " prc contract law " ( hereinafter referred to as the " contract law " ) , without implied explanation
在這一理論前提下,確認(rèn)合同為無(wú)效合同不應(yīng)適用訴訟時(shí)效;而在合同被確認(rèn)為無(wú)效后,由此產(chǎn)生的不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)與損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)則應(yīng)適用訴訟時(shí)效。 - This thesis begins with analyzing the implication , functions , features and the validate standards of the invalid contract , and further argues that the invalid contract in china ’ s contract law should be voided as soon as it was subscribed , and it bears a definite and absolute invalid nature
本文試從分析無(wú)效合同制度的內(nèi)涵、功能、特征及確認(rèn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)入手,以進(jìn)一步明確我國(guó)合同法中之無(wú)效合同當(dāng)屬自始、當(dāng)然、絕對(duì)無(wú)效。 - According to the different results when the assessment by the law when contracts form , this dissertation divides the present effects of contracts into four groups : valid contracts , invalid contracts , indefinite contracts and changeable or cancelable contracts , and analyzes the differences of contracts in different level of effect . the article finally offers two suggestions of lawmaking
根據(jù)在合同成立時(shí)法律對(duì)合同進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)的不同結(jié)果，本文在現(xiàn)有的立法框果內(nèi)把合周的效力劃分成四種形態(tài)，即合同有效，合同無(wú)效，合同的效力待定和合同的可變至、可撤銷，井分析了不周效力狀態(tài)的合同的區(qū)別，最后本文提出了兩項(xiàng)立法建設(shè)。 - Having this theoretical premise , this thesis explores the question concerning to the limitation of actions applicable to voiding the contract . this thesis is divided into three parts : the introduction , the body and conclusion . the introduction first has a picture of the current situation of the theoretical study on limitation of actions for invalid contract ’ s application , and the perplexity as well as difficulties existing in the judicial practice
同時(shí)針對(duì)有體物的返還財(cái)產(chǎn)請(qǐng)求權(quán),其應(yīng)為所有物返還請(qǐng)求權(quán),并且為了妥善保護(hù)給付人利益并督促權(quán)利人實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)利,以區(qū)分登記所有權(quán)與不登記所有權(quán)為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),決定是否適用訴訟時(shí)效:在不登記所有權(quán)場(chǎng)合,所有物返還請(qǐng)求權(quán)適用訴訟時(shí)效;在登記所有權(quán)場(chǎng)合(包括我國(guó)法律要求在所有權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移時(shí)也需登記的那部分動(dòng)產(chǎn)) ,所有物返還請(qǐng)求權(quán)則不適用訴訟時(shí)效。 - It was first posed by yelin , a famous german jurist in 1861 when he published an article , " fault in concluding a treaty : the compensatory responsibility of invalid contract and untenable contract " in the fourth issue of " annals of yelin ' s science of law , " whose chief editor was himself . in this article he systematically and deeply analyzed t he theory of responsibility for fault in concluding a treaty . he thought that under the condition that the contract is invalid or untenable , we should resolve issues according to contract law
締約過(guò)失責(zé)任理論起源于羅馬法的誠(chéng)信訴訟和誠(chéng)信契約，最早由德國(guó)著名法學(xué)家耶林于1861年在其主編的《耶林法學(xué)年報(bào)》第4期上發(fā)表的《締約上過(guò)失：契約無(wú)效與不成立之賠償責(zé)任》一文中對(duì)締約過(guò)失責(zé)任作了系統(tǒng)而深入的分析，認(rèn)為在契約無(wú)效或不成立情況下，應(yīng)依合同法來(lái)解決，從而推翻了實(shí)證法學(xué)的無(wú)契約即無(wú)責(zé)任立論，被譽(yù)為“法學(xué)上的發(fā)現(xiàn)” 。